Date: Sunday, September 21, 2008 @ 17:40:25
Author: eagle
Revision: 5042
Clarifications to the Path Header Field Example. Explain that barbaz
verified the <path-identity> of the previous hop and change the
terminology to be consistent about referring to <path-diagnostic>.
Modified:
docs/usefor/usepro.xml
Modified: docs/usefor/usepro.xml
===================================================================
--- docs/usefor/usepro.xml 2008-09-22 00:18:17 UTC (rev 5041)
+++ docs/usefor/usepro.xml 2008-09-22 00:40:25 UTC (rev 5042)
@@ -455,7 +455,10 @@
"not-for-mail is a common <tail-entry>.</t>
<t>The article was relayed to the relaying agent known, at least
- to old.site.example, as "barbaz".</t>
+ to old.site.example, as "barbaz". That relaying agent confirmed
+ to its satisfaction that "baz.isp.example" was an expected
+ <path-identity> for the source of the article and therefore
+ used <diag-match> ("!") for its <path-diagnostic>.</t>
<t>barbaz relayed it to old.site.example, which does not support
<diag-keyword> and therefore used the old "!" delimiter.
@@ -464,7 +467,7 @@
<t>old.site.example relayed it to a news server using the
<path-identity> of bar.isp.example and claiming (by using the
- "!!" path delimiter) to have verified that it came from
+ "!" <path-diagnostic>) to have verified that it came from
old.site.example.</t>
<t>bar.isp.example relayed it to foo-news which, not being
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.