Re: No posting flag
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:54:30 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Eyrie |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> writes: >>Instead of: > >> newsgroups-line = newsgroup-name >> [ 1*HTAB newsgroup-description ] >> [ *WSP moderation-flag ] >> moderation-flag = SP "(" %x4D.6F.64.65.72.61.74.65.64 ")" >> ; SPACE + case sensitive "(Moderated)" > >>having status-flag which can be moderation-flag or nopost-flag. > > Such a flag would be meaningless except in moderated groups (and one-way > groups really OUGHT to be moderated). It would correspond to the 'n' flag in the NNTP protocol, which does indeed prevent posting. > Even if your intention was that presence of the flag in a checkgroups > would change the ACTIVE flag to 'n', no existing server would do so, and > it would be a long time before it was widely adopted. True, although this would hardly be the first provision in the draft that would take a long time to be adopted. It may be too late to be adding new features, though. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>