Re: Niggles in usepro-draft-11
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:27:42 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> Thorfinn <[email protected]> writes: >On 26 Sep 2008, at 05:06, Russ Allbery wrote: >> "The same" to me includes the possibility of "none." >"the same checks" does definitely have a small difference in >implication to "whatever checks". "the same checks" has a slightly >stronger implication that there is at least one check. It's not a >hugely stronger implication, no. And it is just in implication, >rather than in explicit meaning. Yes, that is essentially the point I was trying to make. Or Julien's "if any" would do as well. >However, I think that that is not a bad implication to have, and you >are certainly correct that "the same" includes the possibility of >"none". Indeed, but if you want to drop more/stronger hints that checks on cancel messages are a Good Thing, then the text(s) discussing cancel messages is the place to do it (but we already say as much as we reasonably can there). >Certainly implementors of news software (the target audience for this) >should already understand that possibility. :-) Implementors "should" do lots of things :-( . -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5