Re: Last Call issues on USEPRO
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:11:27 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Eyrie |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> writes: > *#1582** USEPRO LC 4.3 / 5.2.3: 4.3 overlooks chkscope Resolved but not yet published, as mentioned in the other message. > **#1583** USEPRO LC 5.2.3: Checkgroups control messages There are several individual questions here. One is handling of subhierarchies in combination with groups with the same name as the hierarchy. I generally agree with Charles here that there isn't a better way of handling the edge case than what we currently have, and the group at the top of the sub-hierarchy will have to be listed in the parent checkgroups. Another is the serial number. I think there are two viable options here: unlimited-length serial numbers (the current text) or sequence-space arithmetic. I lean mildly towards the current text just because I don't want to have to write the text for sequence-space arithmetic, and I find persuasive the argument that unlimited-length numbers can be checked with ASCII comparison and don't need to be treated as numbers. Another is what should be done with a checkgroups that doesn't have a serial number when checkgroups for that hierarchy previously did have a serial number. I think this is a gap in the current specification. The last is whether there's a means to reset the serial number. Currently there isn't. It may be worth splitting this point into four issues; the first and the last may already be resolved, depending on whether anyone wants to advocate doing something different about them than what we have now. > I also have a couple of USEPRO issues in the tracker that don't seem to > have been formally closed (another error by the chair, sorry 'bout > that): > 1412 USEPRO 5.3: Cancel newsgroups: matching I remain opposed to this change. I think we need a consensus ruling from a chair on it. I don't believe that it has consensus, but I'm biased by being opposed, so I shouldn't judge that. > 1413 USEPRO 5.5: ihave/sendme syntax This is resolved. > 1414 USEPRO 3.2.1: delimiter for multiple Path identities This is resolved. The first text option in that ticket is in the current draft. > 1415 USEPRO 3.2.1 - Number of path entries per site Still open. I think this needs a consensus ruling. I don't believe the proposed change is necessary, since for the purposes of the protocol multiple systems within an ISP can be considered as one news server and what happens internally is a black box. > 1417 USEPRO 3.4: Injecting-agent modification of message-ID This is resolved with the text mentioned in the ticket. > 1479 USEPRO: Whether moderators SHOULD retain message-ID Currently, we say: <t>Moderators are encouraged to retain the Message-ID header field if it is valid, and also retain the Date header field unless it appears to be stale (72 hours or more in the past) for reasons understood by the moderator (such as delays in the moderation process) in which case they MAY substitute the current date. Any Injection-Date, Injection-Info, or Xref header fields already present MUST be removed.</t> The question is whether the encouragement should be normative. This is still open. > 1482 USEPRO 3.2: Possibility to use non-resolvable domain name as > path-identity This is currently permitted by: <t>A fully-qualified domain name (FQDN) within a domain affiliated with the administrators of the agent and guaranteed to be unique by the administrators of that domain. For example, the uniqueness of server.example.org could be guaranteed by the administrator of example.org even if there is no DNS record for server.example.org itself.</t> The proposal is to say that this is a SHOULD NOT in at least some cases (the specific case cited is using foo.com when only news.foo.com exists in DNS). Currently, we only say that it's not preferred. This is still open. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>