Re: Last Call issues on USEPRO

Charles Lindsey wrote:
> In <[email protected]> Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> writes:
>
>   
>> At long last, I've gotten around to doing what should have been done in 
>> September: Collate the list of Last Call comments.
>>     
>
>   
>> The following were raised as ISSUEs, and have been assigned issue numbers:
>>     
>
>   
>> *#1582** USEPRO LC 4.3 / 5.2.3: 4.3 overlooks chkscope
>> **#1583** USEPRO LC 5.2.3: Checkgroups control messages
>> **#1584 **USEPRO LC 3.2.1: Adding Injection-Date at posting agent
>> **#1585 **USEPRO LC : Length and final dots of newsgroups descriptions
>>     
>
> You are missing:
>
> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:06:35 GMT
> Subject: Re: ISSUE: treatment of POSTED in proto articles
>   
Yes - it did not have ISSUE at the start of the subject line, so I took 
it as a comment. Will add.
> Which I think is the major item oustanding. Russ agrees that a current
> MUST ought to be reduced to SHOULD, but I would prefer to reduce it beyond
> that, so further opinions are needed.
>   
> #1584 also needs to be addressed, but Russ seems to agree that my
> suggested wording is needed, or something like it, so it is just a matter
> of rubber-stamping or otherwise by the WG.
>
> I think the others are now fixed.
>
>