Re: #1479 USEPRO 3.8: Whether moderators SHOULD retain message-ID

"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:58:57 GMT
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.usenet.format
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In <E9962966079B4430B8EC57363028037F@Iulius> Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> writes:

>Hi Harald,

>>   4.  Moderators are encouraged to retain the Message-ID header field
>>       if it is valid, and also retain the Date header field unless it
>>       appears to be stale (72 hours or more in the past)
>>
>> Charles wanted a SHOULD for retaining message-ID. Nobody else commented.

>I also reckon a SHOULD is better for the message-ID.  It would prevent duplicates
>from being posted in case the same proto-article is posted twice (therefore sent
>to the moderator with the same message-ID).  Useful for both auto-moderation bots
>and manual moderation.

>And they are encouraged to retain the Date: header (no need for a SHOULD here).

+1 (naturally)

But it is no huge deal, and no reason to hold up progress at this stage,
so I will live with either.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: [email protected]      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5