Re: #1479 USEPRO 3.8: Whether moderators SHOULD retain message-ID
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:58:57 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <E9962966079B4430B8EC57363028037F@Iulius> Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> writes: >Hi Harald, >> 4. Moderators are encouraged to retain the Message-ID header field >> if it is valid, and also retain the Date header field unless it >> appears to be stale (72 hours or more in the past) >> >> Charles wanted a SHOULD for retaining message-ID. Nobody else commented. >I also reckon a SHOULD is better for the message-ID. It would prevent duplicates >from being posted in case the same proto-article is posted twice (therefore sent >to the moderator with the same message-ID). Useful for both auto-moderation bots >and manual moderation. >And they are encouraged to retain the Date: header (no need for a SHOULD here). +1 (naturally) But it is no huge deal, and no reason to hold up progress at this stage, so I will live with either. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5