Re: #1479 USEPRO 3.8: Whether moderators SHOULD retain message-ID
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:43:19 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Eyrie |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> writes: >> 4. Moderators are encouraged to retain the Message-ID header field >> if it is valid, and also retain the Date header field unless it >> appears to be stale (72 hours or more in the past) >> >> Charles wanted a SHOULD for retaining message-ID. Nobody else commented. > > I also reckon a SHOULD is better for the message-ID. It would prevent > duplicates from being posted in case the same proto-article is posted > twice (therefore sent to the moderator with the same message-ID). > Useful for both auto-moderation bots and manual moderation. > > And they are encouraged to retain the Date: header (no need for a SHOULD > here). To provide some additional history, the reason why the draft currently says encouraged and not SHOULD is fallout from a global decision when I proposed the alternate draft that became this one a while back, namely to avoid any protocol requirements on moderators since, in practice, no constraints are placed on what moderators can do. Looking back on this several years later, I don't feel the passion for the current position that I used to, so at this point I don't really care, although I do think encouraged says all that's really necessary to say. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>