Re: Uncommented diff: define expected <path-identity>

"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes:

>>I proposed the following diff in response to one of the previous
>>discussions, but I don't think I ever got any feedback and hence never
>>applied it.  Could people look this over and tell me if it should be
>>included?
>
> +1, modulo typo below.

Thanks.  This is uncontroversial enough that I'm going to go ahead and
make the change based on that confirmation; if anyone objects, let me
know, and we can talk about it further.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([email protected])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>