Re: ISSUE 1583 status
Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:31:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Organization | TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/ |
| Message-ID | <C0CDB88CDDCE416F8EA50C2C2E801C60@Iulius> |
Hi Harald, > So far, Russ and I are happy, and the rest of the list are silent, so you're a minority. Let's finish this one. I also agree with that change (always including serial numbers once a checkgroups has used them). Shouldn't we add that serials should be compared as a string and not as a number owing to their not being limited in size? A note to future implementors would be useful. I also wonder whether we should not change (or add?) the current example - Control: checkgroups de !de.alt #248 + Control: checkgroups de !de.alt #2009021301 to show a preferred way to use serial numbers. It would be convenient for checkgroups senders not not worry much about the previous number used. -- Julien ÉLIE « J'aime le travail, je passerais des heures à le regarder. »