Re: ISSUE 1583 status
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:57:20 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> Harald Alvestrand <[email protected]> writes: >Charles Lindsey wrote: >> A touch too strong for my liking. Perhaps "... and report for human >> evaluation any subsequent checkgroups control message for the same >> hierarchy or sub-hierarchy with a smaller <chksernr> value or with no >> <chksernr> value.". >> >> But even that seems to suggest that valid chechgroups should be accepted >> on "auto-pilot", which is probably not a good idea. >> >> But I am not pressing this too strongly if others are happy. >> >So far, Russ and I are happy, and the rest of the list are silent, so >you're a minority. Let's finish this one. As I said, I do not press this issue strongly, so let it be. I see Ruus has now comitted it to his working text. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5