Re: Charset in newgroup sample
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:27:20 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Eyrie |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> writes: > In the sample of newgroup control message: > > Control: newgroup example.admin.info moderated > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nxtprt" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > This is a MIME control message. > --nxtprt > Content-Type: application/news-groupinfo > > For your newsgroups file: > example.admin.info About the example.* groups (Moderated) > > --nxtprt > Content-Type: text/plain > > A moderated newsgroup for announcements about new newsgroups in > the example.* hierarchy. > > --nxtprt-- > > wouldn't it be better to put the charsets in order to highlight the > fact they are useful (though it is said the default is US-ASCII)? Yeah, probably a good idea. I'll make that change. > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nxtprt"; charset=us-ascii As near as I can tell from RFC 2046, charset is not a valid parameter for multipart/* content types. It's only supposed to go on the final constituent parts. Among other things, this avoids... > In our case, the most important is the second one. Incidentally, > I wonder what happens when the first one is defined to utf-8 and > the second one is undefined. Is it utf-8 (out of transitivity) > or us-ascii? ...that problem. :) -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>