Re: Possible typos
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:55:00 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <C391C818B4FD4E31A8A10518EB96DDBF@Iulius> =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?= <[email protected]> writes: >In 2: > Transports for Netnews articles MUST treat news articles as uninterpreted > sequences of octets, excluding the values 0 (which may not occur in Netnews > articles) and 13 and 10 (which MUST only appear in Netnews articles as a pair > in that order and which together denote a line separator). >Wouldn't it be better to write %x00, %x0D and %x0A? >"and 13 and 10" -> not ", 13 and 10"? I think I agree. >In 3.3: > Such a history database would grow without bound, however, so it is common > and permitted to optimize based on the Injection-Date or Date header field > of an article as follows. >"to optimize it"? (I do not know whether "it" is mandatory or not in English there.) Yes, I spotted that one and it grated a bit. The "it" is not mandatory, but I agree it would read better with it in. >In 3.6, the Injector-Info: header is mentioned. Isn't it Injection-Info: >instead? Yes. Many many drafts ago, the term _was_ Injector-Info, and this one seems to have been overlooked. >In 3.9: > the leftmost unapproved newsgroup is is the leftmost moderated newsgroup > in that field >Only one "is". +1 > Any Path header field MUST either be removed or truncated to only those entries > following its "POSTED" <diag-keyword>, if any. >Is it clear enough? "following" and not "preceding"? It depends on the direction >we read the Path: header :) Since the Path header is generated right to left, this confusion will always be there, but I think "following" is correct, and I think that is the usage elsewhere in the drafts. >In 3.10.2: > there is no one "official" gateway >Is "one" correct here? (Probably yes, but better ask.) Yes, that is correct. >What if Original-Sender already exists? Is it renamed to X-Original-Sender (as 3.10.4 >seems to suggest)? The re-re-sender needs to use his imagination! It is not actually forbidden to have two Original-Senders, and he could add a comment if he was that fussy. But I don't think we really care, so leave it be. Those are my comments. I presume Russ will adopt them as he sees fit. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5