Re: Possible typos

"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:55:00 GMT
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.usenet.format
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In <C391C818B4FD4E31A8A10518EB96DDBF@Iulius> =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?= <[email protected]> writes:

>In 2:

>    Transports for Netnews articles MUST treat news articles as uninterpreted
>    sequences of octets, excluding the values 0 (which may not occur in Netnews
>    articles) and 13 and 10 (which MUST only appear in Netnews articles as a pair
>    in that order and which together denote a line separator).

>Wouldn't it be better to write %x00, %x0D and %x0A?
>"and 13 and 10" -> not ", 13 and 10"?

I think I agree.

>In 3.3:

>    Such a history database would grow without bound, however, so it is common
>    and permitted to optimize based on the Injection-Date or Date header field
>    of an article as follows.

>"to optimize it"?  (I do not know whether "it" is mandatory or not in English there.)

Yes, I spotted that one and it grated a bit. The "it" is not mandatory,
but I agree it would read better with it in.

>In 3.6, the Injector-Info: header is mentioned.  Isn't it Injection-Info:
>instead?

Yes. Many many drafts ago, the term _was_ Injector-Info, and this one seems
to have been overlooked.

>In 3.9:

>    the leftmost unapproved newsgroup is is the leftmost moderated newsgroup
>    in that field

>Only one "is".

+1

>    Any Path header field MUST either be removed or truncated to only those entries
>    following its "POSTED" <diag-keyword>, if any.

>Is it clear enough?  "following" and not "preceding"?  It depends on the direction
>we read the Path: header :)

Since the Path header is generated right to left, this confusion will
always be there, but I think "following" is correct, and I think that is
the usage elsewhere in the drafts.

>In 3.10.2:

>    there is no one "official" gateway

>Is "one" correct here?  (Probably yes, but better ask.)

Yes, that is correct.

>What if Original-Sender already exists?  Is it renamed to X-Original-Sender (as 3.10.4
>seems to suggest)?

The re-re-sender needs to use his imagination! It is not actually
forbidden to have two Original-Senders, and he could add a comment if he
was that fussy. But I don't think we really care, so leave it be.

Those are my comments. I presume Russ will adopt them as he sees fit.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131            Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: [email protected]      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5