Re: ISSUE 1583 status
Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> Sat, 9 May 2009 09:17:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Organization | TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/ |
| Message-ID | <D2AE877CE54C4B479A2178EE252D185E@Iulius> |
Hi Russ,
> Existing checkgroups implementations will completely ignore the scope
> syntax and process the checkgroups anyway. The backward compatibility
> issue is that we have to be sure that nothing bad happens when they do
> that. I don't remember the exact details, but I think we decided that
> was why it was hard to do anything better than what we have here.
OK, thanks.
It is true that we currently have:
checkgroups:[email protected]:cn.bbs.*:verify-cn.bbs.admin.announce
so including "cn.bbs" in this checkgroups will not be honoured. Only
the checkgroups for "cn.*" can currently act upon "cn.bbs".
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Le travail est l'opium du peuple et
je ne veux pas mourir drogué. » (Boris Vian)