Re: I-D ACTION:draft-spencer-usefor-son-of-1036-01.txt

Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:38:19 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.usenet.format
Organization TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
Message-ID <CD34AE23AFB14CB6BDBF78DEE506FD16@Iulius>
Hi Charles,

> This just includes a few tweaks requested by the RFC-Editor. Hopefully it
> is now ready for final publication.

I have just done a diff between the two versions.  Only four or five changes.
Amongst them, a sentence has been rewritten but still needs to be changed.
(", and the presence of unresolved issues.")

   The technical content remains unchanged, including the references to
   the document itself as a Draft rather than an RFC, the presence of
   unresolved issues, The original section numbering has been preserved,
   although the original pagination has not (among other reasons, it did
   not fully follow IETF formatting standards).


The few typos I reported in May weren't fixed in that new version.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Julien ÉLIE

« Il y a un proverbe serbe qui dit ceci : « Notre passé est sinistre,
  notre présent est invivable, heureusement que nous n'avons pas d'avenir ! »
  (Philippe Geluck)