Diffs for the msg-id issue in -usefor
Harald Alvestrand <[email protected]> Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:43:15 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This note sent to make sure I have everything in one place, and to make
sure I have informed the WG of what I'm planning to do.
Apologies for letting this drift so long.
Msg-id as defined in RFC 2822:
message-id = "Message-ID:" msg-id CRLF
in-reply-to = "In-Reply-To:" 1*msg-id CRLF
references = "References:" 1*msg-id CRLF
msg-id = [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]
id-left = dot-atom-text / no-fold-quote / obs-id-left
id-right = dot-atom-text / no-fold-literal / obs-id-right
no-fold-quote = DQUOTE *(qtext / quoted-pair) DQUOTE
no-fold-literal = "[" *(dtext / quoted-pair) "]"
Msg-id as defined in RFC 5322:
msg-id = [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]
id-left = dot-atom-text / obs-id-left
id-right = dot-atom-text / no-fold-literal / obs-id-right
no-fold-literal = "[" *dtext "]"
Msg-id as defined in -usefor:
msg-id = "<" msg-id-core ">"
; maximum length is 250 octets
msg-id-core = id-left "@" id-right
id-left = dot-atom-text / no-fold-quote
id-right = dot-atom-text / no-fold-literal
no-fold-quote = DQUOTE
( "." *mqtext /
*mqtext "." /
*mqtext mqspecial *mqtext )
DQUOTE
mqtext = atext / "." / mqspecial
mqspecial = "(" / ")" / ; same as specials except
"<" / ; "\" and DQUOTE quoted
"[" / "]" / ; "." doubled and ">" omitted
":" / ";" /
"@" / "," /
".." / "\\" / "\" DQUOTE
no-fold-literal = "[" *( mdtext / "\[" / "\]" / "\\" ) "]"
mdtext = %d33-61 / ; The rest of the US-ASCII
%d63-90 / ; characters not including
%d94-126 ; ">", "[", "]", or "\"
msg-id as proposed by Charles to allow us to reference 5322:
message-id = "Message-ID:" SP *WSP msg-id *WSP CRLF
msg-id = "<" msg-id-core ">"
; maximum length is 250 octets
msg-id-core = id-left "@" id-right
id-left = dot-atom-text
id-right = dot-atom-text / no-fold-literal
no-fold-literal = "[" **mdtext* "]"
mdtext = %d33-61 / ; The rest of the US-ASCII
%d63-90 / ; characters not including
%d94-126 ; ">", "[", "]", or "\"
The differences between this proposal and 5322 are:
- No CFWS before or after
- No obs-* productions
- No > characters inside a no-fold-literal
I think this is appropriate, and will tell the RFC Editor that he should make that change.
Harald