Re: Typos and new message-ID syntax in RFC 5538

In <02FCE9AB44A54784A0946723975A84D3@Iulius> =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Julien_=C9LIE?= <[email protected]> writes:

>Hi,

>Shouldn't a few things be changed in draft-ellermann-news-nntp-uri-11
>before its publication as RFC 5538?
>Especially after the changed made in RFC 5536 (USEFOR)?

Yes, but 5538 is on hold until 5536 is fixed. Then it is up to Frank in
the 1st instance (though I have recently failed to contact him by email,
and he does not seem to be reading this list anymore).

So keep your fixes on hold until we get to that point.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131            Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: [email protected]      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5