Re: Syntax validation of articles by injecting agents

In <[email protected]> Richard Clayton <[email protected]> writes:

>In message <[email protected]>, Charles Lindsey
><[email protected]> writes

>>But I don't think RFC 2049 ever intended to imply that MIME-Version was
>>needed for a message that did not actually use any of the MIME features.

>Hardly on topic for this list, but yes that's exactly what it means, and
>what it was intended to mean.  It's no big deal for a client to generate
>the header field, so it's hardly onerous!  (see this message for an
>example of a compliant client)

Then how do you account for the option of not including in in RFC 2047?

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131            Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: [email protected]      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5