Re: Syntax validation of articles by injecting agents

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <[email protected]>, Charles Lindsey
<[email protected]> writes
>
>In <[email protected]> Richard Clayton <[email protected]> 
>writes:
>
>>In message <[email protected]>, Charles Lindsey
>><[email protected]> writes
>
>>>But I don't think RFC 2049 ever intended to imply that MIME-Version was
>>>needed for a message that did not actually use any of the MIME features.
>
>>Hardly on topic for this list, but yes that's exactly what it means, and
>>what it was intended to mean.  It's no big deal for a client to generate
>>the header field, so it's hardly onerous!  (see this message for an
>>example of a compliant client)
>
>Then how do you account for the option of not including in in RFC 2047?

I think it's saying that you must expect MUAs to parse encoded words
without checking if the Mime-Version: header field is or is not present
(and giving permission for MUAs to be optimised that way)

- -- 
richard                                                   Richard Clayton

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBS0TX95oAxkTY1oPiEQJQKwCcCIDpyKdf3Jl15oCKm1qgafnF62YAoIGp
mZY5jS4zDoSY65KkQPnbRlUu
=tMPv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----