Re: USWG Minutes from Yokohama (fwd)

1) Will FYI 7 be forwarded?

2) It looks like Ray had his hands full!  ;-)

April Marine wrote:

>Hi folks,
>
>Many thanks to Ray for chairing the Yokohama meeting and sending these
>minutes.
>
>After reviewing these and briefly emailing with Ray and Harald (our AD),
>it has been agreed that it's clearly time to shut down this WG.  The list
>will remain "active". :)
>
>Many many thanks to all the folks who have contributed to the USWG and to
>the User Services Area over the last many years.  What, 15 years or so?
>Many thanks to Joyce.
>
>many thanks in general! :)
>April
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
>From: April Marine <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: April Marine <[email protected]>
>Subject: USWG Minutes from Yokohama
>
>Late minutes
>
>***********************************************************
>
>USWG
>
>IETF 54
>13:00
>15 July 2002
>
>Yokohama, Japan
>
>Prepared by Ray Plzak
>
>
>1) Welcome, scribe, agenda bashing
>
>Ray Plzak volunteered to be scribe.  There were no changes to the
>agenda.
>
>
>2) FYI 7
>
>The group was asked if FYI 7 was advanced enough.  There was no
>response.  There was no discussion from the group in regards to the
>future of FYI 7.
>
>
>3)  Directory of Standards as Related to Services
>
>The proposal would be to provide an RFC listing in answer to FAQ type
>questions.  There was no comment from the group whether the WG should
>take this on as a project.
>
>
>4)  Educating the Educators
>
>It has been observed that academia is teaching outmoded concepts such as
>classful IP.
>
>Should there be an FYI developed for this?  There was no comment from
>the group.
>
>Should the WG take this on?  There was no comment from the group.
>
>
>5)  Future of the WG
>
>Is there any more work for the WG to do?  There was no comment from the
>group.
>
>Should the WG continue?  There was no comment from the group.
>
>
>6) AOB - None.
>
>
>
>
>.
>
>  
>