Re: [v6ops] [IPv6] Why folks are blocking IPv6 extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)
Nick Buraglio <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opsec,gmane.ietf.v6ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGB08_cBiQBrkHgNiog6r5KL4NBsppy5b_KQCyZ1_0WxOqWZmA@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks, Dale. 9098 was more what I was thinking. I don't believe I have read that but will do so now. nb On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:03 AM Dale W. Carder <[email protected]> wrote: > Thus spake Nick Buraglio ([email protected]) on Thu, May 18, > 2023 at 09:49:21AM -0500: > > Is there any document that details the current operational best practices > > or explains the EH options and use cases in a succinct document? > > Sort of in RFC9098. (Note there's also a lot of references in section 5 > also.) > > I've always thought that as an operational resource, RFC4890 did a > phenomenal job, but I'm not as sure the guidance would be as clear cut > for extension headers generally. > > Dale >