Re: [v6ops] [IPv6] Why folks are blocking IPv6 extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)

Nick Buraglio <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opsec,gmane.ietf.v6ops
Message-ID <CAGB08_cBiQBrkHgNiog6r5KL4NBsppy5b_KQCyZ1_0WxOqWZmA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks, Dale. 9098 was more what I was thinking. I don't believe I have
read that but will do so now.

nb

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:03 AM Dale W. Carder <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thus spake Nick Buraglio ([email protected]) on Thu, May 18,
> 2023 at 09:49:21AM -0500:
> > Is there any document that details the current operational best practices
> > or explains the EH options and use cases in a succinct document?
>
> Sort of in RFC9098.  (Note there's also a lot of references in section 5
> also.)
>
> I've always thought that as an operational resource, RFC4890 did a
> phenomenal job, but I'm not as sure the guidance would be as clear cut
> for extension headers generally.
>
> Dale
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.