Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Why folks are blocking IPv6 extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)

Arnaud Taddei <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opsec,gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ipv6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Would like to support Fernando again, and not just because I have a Sony TV too. 

Cybersecurity is in such a bad state that I can only plea for a sense of realism and pragmatism vs dogmatism to get real solutions at hand to the defenders practitioners

If not I will ask people here to consider spending a week in a Security Operation Center when there is a Ransomware breaking up 

Fernando’s paper intentions will be appreciated by the defenders  



> On 25 May 2023, at 03:07, Fernando Gont <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 25/5/23 02:01, Manfredi (US), Albert E wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ipv6 <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Fernando Gont
>>> Given the amount of things that get connected to the Net (smart bulbs, refrigerators, etc.) -- and that will super-likely never receive security updates, you may have to **rely on your own network**.
>>> 
>>> For instance, I wouldn't have my smart TV "defend itself".
>> Agreed, "on your own network." From the viewpoint of a household, whatever network defense has to be behind that household's router, for it to be credible, and preferably right in each host. Yeah, some IoT devices may not be updated regularly.
> 
> So, that's why people block them at the edge.
> 
> (just the messenger)
> 
> 
> 
>> The ISP has to worry about protecting that ISP's own network. 
> 
> That's e.g. where RFC9098 comes in, with notes on why they are dropped in places other than the edge network.
> 
> 
> 
>> Households have to be responsible for protecting their household's network. (And connected TVs do get regular software updates, as a matter of fact.)
> 
> I guess it all depends on the TV? e.g., I for one I'm not planning to throw it out just because Sony decided to quit pushing updates (which were never automatic for my set).
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: [email protected]
> PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec&source=gmail-imap&ust=1685581681000000&usg=AOvVaw2CR1KLp2V-YO9ZOvhwrWtn


-- 
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted 
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy 
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are 
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the 
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, 
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and 
destroy any printed copy of it.
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 4.1 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.