Re: New draft: carrying/renumbering assigned prefixes in IS-IS/OSPFv3 (lsr-v6ops-pd-aargh-00)

David 'equinox' Lamparter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ospf,gmane.ietf.v6ops
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 09:33:57PM -0400, Acee Lindem wrote:
> I thought that DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation (PD) could have multiple
> levels of delegation and that mechanism alone could be used for
> assignment within a domain?  I must admit that it has been a very long
> time since the home net WG discussions.

It can, but using it that way essentially forces you into picking an
"upstream" interface on each router and building a spanning tree that
the assignment travels down on.  It's just running the same protocol
up- & downstream as server and client, not some actual "levels" feature
in the protocol.

Unless I'm misremembering (yeah, long time...) there was consensus that
hierarchical DHCPv6-PD is not desirable for homenet;  if a network
warrants using OSPF or IS-IS, hierarchical PD is going to be even less
desirable.


Cheers,
-equi/David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.