Re: New draft: carrying/renumbering assigned prefixes in IS-IS/OSPFv3 (lsr-v6ops-pd-aargh-00)
David 'equinox' Lamparter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ospf,gmane.ietf.v6ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 09:33:57PM -0400, Acee Lindem wrote: > I thought that DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation (PD) could have multiple > levels of delegation and that mechanism alone could be used for > assignment within a domain? I must admit that it has been a very long > time since the home net WG discussions. It can, but using it that way essentially forces you into picking an "upstream" interface on each router and building a spanning tree that the assignment travels down on. It's just running the same protocol up- & downstream as server and client, not some actual "levels" feature in the protocol. Unless I'm misremembering (yeah, long time...) there was consensus that hierarchical DHCPv6-PD is not desirable for homenet; if a network warrants using OSPF or IS-IS, hierarchical PD is going to be even less desirable. Cheers, -equi/David