[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: Fwd: New Version Notificatio n - draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-18.txt

Geoff,

On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 8:58 PM Geoff Huston <[email protected]> wrote:

>

> I think you appear to be getting "requestor" and "responder" confused in
> your proposed text. Did you mean to say the following?
>
>
Arrgh - Guilty and thank you for that.

UDP responders should compose response response packets with a maximum UDP
> payload size that fits in the minimum
> of the offered requestor's maximum UDP payload size, [RFC6891], the
> interface MTU, the network MTU value configured by the knowledge of the
> network operators,
> and the RECOMMENDED maximum DNS/UDP payload size 1400.


You say "response response" in your text, but yes yes that was where I was
going with it.

Paul, does this give the future proofing you were thinking of?

David - is that text for R5 more in line?

thanks
tim

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]