[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: systemd-resolved not aboiding IPv6 DNS Servers

Hi,

On 04/04/2025, 10:29, "Tobias Fiebig" <[email protected]> wrote:

Moin,

On Fri, 2025-04-04 at 08:13 +0000, Tim Chown wrote:
> The general principle in 8504 is to be a summary of requirements and
> to point to other RFCs that define them, so doing both is perfectly
> viable.

Fair point; Question is, though, if one would want to basically create
a dependency for the publication of 8504bis on 3901bis; Something tells
me that it will be a longer road for the latter. ;-)

Yes, in this case that would be the downside.

We had a similar discussion about EH processing for 8504. You’ll see some text in there about that, as we thought that better than a dependency on a parallel draft.  That “parallel draft” is now only just in IESG review several years on.

Tim

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]