[Int-area] Re: [v6ops] Re: NDP for RFC4291 Sec. 2. 5.5.1. IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Addresses for v4-w-v6-nh Forwar ding/RFC8950 at RS

Tobias Fiebig wrote on 07/04/2025 23:17:
> This occurs, for example, if you have an RFC8950 session to a route-
> server at an IX and the route-server also sends you v4 routes with a
> _v4_ nexthop.

At the risk of raining on some parades, rfc8950 at internet exchanges is 
experimental so far. The long term future of this approach isn't clear, 
given that its intention is to relieve the impact of lack of 
availability of ipv4, which is readily available at modest cost, at 
least relative to the overall cost of running an infrastructure asset 
like an IXP.

Nick

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]