[dhcwg] Re: [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now su pports DHCPv6 PD

Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:05:09 +0900
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.v6ops
Message-ID <CAKD1Yr1b-uxP0EtXJpXDZcAVdQ78wXFDE24LHZNkEhdyypazxQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:03 AM Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Recommendations for network operators are written in RFC 9663. Some text
> > about expected prefix lengths is in section 8 of that RFC. RFC 9762 says
> > the prefix must be SLAAC-sized, which currently means it must be a /64
> per
> > device. A /48 is fine for a small or medium network, but a campus with
> tens
> > of thousands of devices on it probably needs more than that.
>
> If but anyone had warned of this outcome before.
>

That you did. and I assume it's fair to say you will also oppose an attempt
to change this policy? Or is it worth trying to change it?

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]