[dhcwg] Re: [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now su pports DHCPv6 PD
Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:05:09 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.v6ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKD1Yr1b-uxP0EtXJpXDZcAVdQ78wXFDE24LHZNkEhdyypazxQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:03 AM Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > > Recommendations for network operators are written in RFC 9663. Some text > > about expected prefix lengths is in section 8 of that RFC. RFC 9762 says > > the prefix must be SLAAC-sized, which currently means it must be a /64 > per > > device. A /48 is fine for a small or medium network, but a campus with > tens > > of thousands of devices on it probably needs more than that. > > If but anyone had warned of this outcome before. > That you did. and I assume it's fair to say you will also oppose an attempt to change this policy? Or is it worth trying to change it? _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]