[dhcwg] Re: [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now su pports DHCPv6 PD

Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:36:27 +0900
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.v6ops
Message-ID <CAKD1Yr33X3cFLAKhwTMtEYYKgeDnrSvZVsL1aNyLphoQ0-88Ew@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 17 Sept 2025, 09:17 Mark Smith, <[email protected]> wrote:

> If but anyone had warned of this outcome before.
>>
>
> If you're worried about IPv6 address space running out, you might want to
> have a look at the original IPv6 proposal in RFC 8507, which proposed a 64
> bit address space.
>

There's no need to look at history here. We can just observe that all
cellular networks assign two or more /64s to every device by default, all
the time. That is the industry standard and was strongly argued for by the
IETF when mobile operators originally designed the standards to assign only
a single /128 per device.

Why RIPE would have a policy that allows cellular networks to provide
multiple /64s per device but doesn't allow, say, enterprise networks to do
the same seems somewhat arbitrary and unfair. After all, both of these are
IETF-standard deployment models.

>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]