[dhcwg] Re: [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now su pports DHCPv6 PD
Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:36:27 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.v6ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKD1Yr33X3cFLAKhwTMtEYYKgeDnrSvZVsL1aNyLphoQ0-88Ew@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, 17 Sept 2025, 09:17 Mark Smith, <[email protected]> wrote: > If but anyone had warned of this outcome before. >> > > If you're worried about IPv6 address space running out, you might want to > have a look at the original IPv6 proposal in RFC 8507, which proposed a 64 > bit address space. > There's no need to look at history here. We can just observe that all cellular networks assign two or more /64s to every device by default, all the time. That is the industry standard and was strongly argued for by the IETF when mobile operators originally designed the standards to assign only a single /128 per device. Why RIPE would have a policy that allows cellular networks to provide multiple /64s per device but doesn't allow, say, enterprise networks to do the same seems somewhat arbitrary and unfair. After all, both of these are IETF-standard deployment models. > _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]