[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Moving DNS64 (RFC6147) to Intern et Standard

> The functionality of DNS64 is still needed with NAT64 -- it just
> need not be in a network device but can/should be in the client.

Just curious, are there hosts that literally have a DNS64 component for
communication with the IPv4 internet?

One of the (many) problems with DNS64 in combination with NAT64 is that
it doesn't provide a solution for IPv4 literals.

This can be solved by either running a CLAT on the host or a library
that can synthesize the right IPv6 address based on an IPv4 address.
If a library already has that capability, then why introduce DNS64 as well?

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]