[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: Re: Re: Moving DNS64 (RF C6147) to Internet Standard

Philip Homburg <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:53:13 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.dnsop,gmane.ietf.v6ops
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

>"it is signed" does not imply "an off-the-shelf client will do local
>DNSSEC validation and fail on DNS64 replies"...  but out of curiousity:
>is there anyone defaulting to "validation on" in their stub resolvers?

Not exactly stub resolvers, but DNSSEC validating proxies are quite common.

>And if this is relevant, will it excert enough pressure on major sites
>like slack.com to add an IPv6 endpoint?  It's 2026, after all... no
>valid excuses anymore.

Maybe standards that break IPv4 access are not a great way to promote IPv6?


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]