RE: Name relationships in vCard 3.0
Misha Wolf <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:43:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vcard |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> As far as I know, N & FN should mean the same thing.=20 Indeed. Now all we have to decide is what we mean by "mean". Misha -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] = On Behalf Of Goh Siew Yong Sent: 09 September 2004 13:00 To: Misha Wolf; Germ=E1n M. Rivera; Jeff Parrish; [email protected] Subject: RE: Name relationships in vCard 3.0 Yes I guess you can. But you never know how the parser or receiving appl. will interpret them. Though syntactically it will not cause any problem. Just like you can enter anything say Jane in the field for first name,Tan for family name for a form in the ab application. And then a completely different thing say Peter Brown for full name field.=20 As far as I know, N & FN should mean the same thing.=20 As specified in RF2426: N type requires the text to be in the format following the semantics of X.520 Common Name attribute. While FN type need to be a structured text value. Each component can have multiple values. The components in the structure has to be of the followi= ng sequence : Family Name, Given Name, Additional Names, Honorific Prefix, a= nd Honorific suffixes. These components are separated by semi-colon. Individ= ual text can also includes multiple text separated by commas. This type is ba= sed on the semantics of X.520 individual name attributes. The example given in the RFC was=20 FN:Mr. John Q. Public\, Esq. N:Public;John;Qinlan;Mr.;Esq -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.