Re: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-neystadt-imap-status-counters-00. txt
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:51:41 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vpim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg)" <[email protected]> > Is there any objection to a new flag with explicit semantics of importance? > The meaning of \flagged is private between a client and it's store. The > importance is a sender-indicated message attribute, not a recipient > indication of a particular level of interest or importance they may wish to > recall between sessions. We need a flag that is standardized by convention > between a message deposit process that can set this flag and the many > different clients that would expect the flag to be there if a message is > tagged as important. This assumes that current-day clients use \flagged in different ways. Is that indeed so? Every client I've seen seems to either ignore it or treat it as a "must look at this message" flag. --Arnt ---------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent to you, since you are subscribed to [email protected]. You can manage your subscription at http://www.neystadt.org/cgi-bin/majordomo