Re: RE: AD Review of draft-ietf-vpim-vpimdir and draft-ietf-vpim-rout ing

At 11:35 09/08/04 -0400, Glenn Parsons wrote:
><http://www.iana.org/assignments/ldap-parameters>http://www.iana.org/assignments/ldap-parameters 
>
>
>RFC 2279 (UTF-8) has been obsoleted by RFC 3629.  Which reference is 
>appropriate?

Having recently been caught out by this in another document, if you update 
to use RFC 3629, make sure you also take cognizance of the fact that the 
later version restricts the UTF-8 UCS character representation to 4-octet 
sequences rather than 6-octets as previously.

This is not a reason to resist using the later spec.  But, OTOH, you 
explicitly wish to retain compatibility with systems that may use the older 
spec.  I don't know what's right for you here.

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact


_______________________________________________
VPIM mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vpim