Re: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-amr-13.txt -- please include link to source code

James,

I am not convinced that a informative reference to the implementation 
directly from the payload format is necessary. There exist ways of 
finding the reference implementation, it is for example referenced in 
the AMR main spec TS 26.090. If the draft was not approved and in the 
rfc-editors queue I would be less inclined to avoid doing this change.

A direct link to to the specification is anyway out of the question. The 
reason is that the specification may be changed in the future and then a 
new version number will be given. Somebody may find a bug in the 
reference implementation (not that unlikely) and a change request is 
sent in. It that change request is approved the updated specification 
will be given the version number 4.2.0 which will result in that the 
filename becomes 26073-420.zip. Due to this a direct link can not be used.

Regards

Magnus Westerlund

James Salsman wrote:

>Magnus,
>
>Hold on, I've changed my mind
>
>The way 
>
>>http://www.3gpp.org/specs/titles-numbers.htm
>>
>is written now, there is no click-path through to the source code.
>
>Please explain to me why 
>
>>>> ftp://ftp.3gpp.org/Specs/latest/Rel-4/26_series/26073-410.zip
>>>>
>can't be used, again?
>
>Best wishes,
>James
>

-- 

Magnus Westerlund 

Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research ERA/T/VA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson Radio Systems AB  | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]



----------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent to you, since you are subscribed to
[email protected]. You can manage your subscription at
http://www.neystadt.org/cgi-bin/majordomo