Re: VRRP - Multiple Masters Question
Mukesh Gupta <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Organization | Tropos Networks |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Radia, On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 15:12 -0800, Radia Perlman wrote: > I like Don's interpretation, and his implementation should be compatible > with stations > that follow the spec, but it seems better to have the spec reflect what > the WG wants > rather than implementations diverging from the spec. So I'd hope, if the > WG likes > this interpretation, that we change the spec. I agree ! > Also, I suppose there's another choice to be made: > > If an implementation "uses" the master's interval, does that mean it > overwrites what it has > been configured with? I assume not...i.e., if you temporarily bring up a > master with > a short timer, once that master goes away, the other nodes will revert > to their old value, right? No it does not make sense to overwrite what it has been configured with. The node should keep using the master's interval till it keeps hearing the master. As soon as the master disappears, they start using their configured advertisement interval. Don, I am curious about why you didn't raise the issue and got the spec fixed instead of deviating your implementation from the spec :) Regards Mukesh _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp