RE: Reminder of posting of draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv4-timers-01.txt
"Mathur Sonum-CSM109" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Few comments on the draft
If the VR_Mode = 1, then:
o Send an ADVERTISEMENT
o Set the Adver_Timer to Advertisement_Interval
else:
o Send a FAST ADVERTISEMENT
o Set the Adver_2_Timer to Advertisement_Interval
For initialization, when VR_Mode = 1, then why are Fast Advts. not sent.
VR_Mode = 1 indicates that both types of VRRP implementations are
present. Then, to satisfy the backup routers with newer implementation,
Fast Advts. are needed. If not, they will declare Master Down and will
try to become Master causing more than one Masters to be active.
- If the Adver_2_Timer fires, then:
If the VR_Mode is 1
or
if the VR_Type is 2, then:
o Send a FAST ADVERTISEMENT
o Reset the Adver_2_Timer to VR_Adver_Interval
When Adver_2_Timer fires, and VR_Type configured on the local router is
2, then local router should send a Fast Advt. Why do we need a check for
VR_Mode == 1 at all ? In my opinion, the only check for sending Fast
Advt should be VR_Type == 2. Please clarify.
I would like to suggest removal of parameter 'VR_Mode'. If there is a
situation of new implementation inter operating with older one, we can
live with ignore and log. Although 'VR_Mode' takes care of this issue,
but implementation would be relatively simpler if we don't consider the
heterogeneous environment. This is just my opinion, if this topic is
still open for discussion.
--
Sonum
________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Hott, Robert W CIV B35-Branch
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 6:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [VRRP] Reminder of posting of
draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv4-timers-01.txt
All,
This is just a reminder that the draft for providing
sub-second timers for VRRP for IPv4 was posted. I would appreciate any
comments that you might have on this draft.
Abstract: The router survivability capability provided by the
Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol for IPv4 (VRRPv4) satisfies the
requirements for many LAN environments. There are, however, LAN
environments that have sub-second failover requirements and thus a need
for finer granularity of the VRRP timers. This draft proposes extensions
to VRRPv4 [RFC 3768] for specifying sub-second Advertisement Intervals.
A new message type is introduced which permits the timer granularity for
the Advertisement Interval to be specified. In addition, a new field is
introduced permitting the specification of the number of missed
ADVERTISEMENTs before a Virtual Router Master is declared down.
Bob Hott
Robert (Bob) W. Hott
NSWC-DD
Code B35, Bldg. 1500A/122A
17320 Dahlgren Road
Dahlgren, VA 22448-5100
540-653-1497 (W)
540-653-8673 (FAX)
[email protected] (E-mail)
_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp