RE: MIB Dr. Review of draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-05.txt
Bill Fenner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>5) I consulted with other MIB Doctors and the rough consensus was to >leave deprected objects where they are in the MIB, even though they are >deprecated but to make it very obvious that they are deprected. As Kaylan mentions, in my AD + RFC4181 review I suggested moving these, based on having received the same suggestion when we did RFC 4293, 4113, 4022. I thought that was the accepted procedure (it made sense to me, since we want a new MIB user to see and use the current objects before the deprecated ones). Bill _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp