Re: vrrp Digest, Vol 25, Issue 5

"Vedavinayagam Ganesan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.vrrp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
As per RFC, this is an expected behavior. During the time when RA is in BACKUP state (after no shut), the pre-emption enable/disable status does not impact the state since the priority of the received advertisement packet from RB is same as RA's VR's priority. (The value of pre-emption has meaning in RA only if the priority in the received packet is less than RA's VR's priority)

And this is also practically a correct behavior. We do not expect a flipping in the existing router state by adding a new VR with same priority.


On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 [email protected] wrote :
>Send vrrp mailing list submissions to
> 	[email protected]
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	[email protected]
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	[email protected]
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of vrrp digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Routers having same priority with pre-empt enabled (Manjula j)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:26:12 +0100 (BST)
> From: Manjula j <[email protected]>
>Subject: [VRRP] Routers having same priority with pre-empt enabled
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Hi,
>
>   Can anyone please tell me what is the behavior of below scenario:
>
>   Electing MASTER & BACKUP router when having SAME PRIORITY
>
>   1--- > Router(RA) is master(with ip 1.1.1.2) & Router(RB) is BACKUP(with ip 1.1.1.1)
>
>   2 --- > Both the routers are having same priority say 100.
>
>   3 ---  > Now shut the master that is RA.
>
>   4 ---  > RB becomes the MASTER
>
>   5 ---   > Now no shut the MASTER. RA remains as BACKUP router since the priority is same.
>
>
>   Is this is the expected behavior? Please explain.
>
>   Regards,
>   Manjula
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>  Find out what India is talking about on  - Yahoo! Answers India
>  Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/vrrp/attachments/20060914/2ce4c064/attachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>vrrp mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp
>
>
>End of vrrp Digest, Vol 25, Issue 5
>***********************************

_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.