Re: Multiple Virtual Address Question
"Arnab Bakshi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/22/07, Muneer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/16/07, Don Provan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >How should the protocol function if the set of Virtual Addresses > > >contains IP addresses that are both "owned" and "not-owned" by > > >the local VRRP Router? > > > > The set of IP addresses in any given Virtual Router are all owned > > by the same node. What you are describing is a configuration with > > multiple Virtual Routers, each requiring its own VR ID. > > > > Can you help me to find out the priority in router A in the following scenario? > > Router1 has IP address A, router2 has IP address B. Now, I create a > virtual router with associated IP as A and C. +++arnab: What my understanding is that if you make IP Address A as primary address of Virtual Router then priority should be 255, for IP Address C the priority will be 100(default). Thanks Arnab > > Thanks in advance. > > -Muneer > -- > Imagination is more important than knowledge... > > _______________________________________________ > vrrp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp > _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp