RE: How about one unified document?
"Stephen Nadas (RL/TNT)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F4565ABF2BF72240B26E924CE5D60AB6053F2746@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se> |
I am okay with this forward. I'm also willing to edit the doc. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Radia Perlman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 1:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [VRRP] How about one unified document? After discussion with Mukesh, we both agree that instead of a VRRP for IPv4 and one for IPv6 and one for subsecond timers, it would be nice to obsolete all of those with a single document that covers all. Rather than finalizing the IPv6 document, it would be nice to use it as a base for the unified document, adding in the subsecond timers as well as IPv4 support into one document. Then we'd have a unified protocol document as well as a unified MIB document. What do people think? And if people think this is a good idea, would anyone like to volunteer to be the editor of this document? Radia & Mukesh _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp