RE: Draft draft-nadas-vrrp-unified-spec-01.txt as a WG item

I definitely think that this draft should be accepted as a WG item. I
vote YES.

Bob Hott 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mukesh Gupta [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 1:54
To: [email protected]
Subject: [VRRP] Draft draft-nadas-vrrp-unified-spec-01.txt as a WG item

Folks,

The chairs would like to determine the consensus on accepting draft
draft-nadas-vrrp-unified-spec-01.txt as a WG item for replacing VRRP for
IPv6 (draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-08.txt).

If anyone is opposed to accepting this document, please respond to the
list saying that you oppose accepting the document as a WG document, and
provide the reasons for your opposition.

If you support accepting the draft as a WG item, please respond with
your Yes as well.

Regards
Radia & Mukesh


-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Nadas [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 6:23 PM
To: Don Provan
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [VRRP] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-nadas-vrrp-unified-spec-00.txt 

Hi Don and list,

I have just posted draft-nadas-vrrp-unified-spec-01.txt.  

I would like to ask the working group to consider taking up this draft
as a working group document. 

Thanks and regards, 
Steve  

_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp

_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp