Virtual MAC really necessary?
"Roland Abt" <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:31:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello everybody I want to implement my own VRRP protocol. The protocol itself is not that tricky, but using a virtual MAC seems like a big hurdle to me. The standard states that the MAC address of the new Master has to be published in a gratuitous ARP (request/reply). I think this already should help to update the ARP table of every device. Does anybody know of a situation where publishing the physical MAC would cause any trouble? Are there any known devices that would not update their ARP table in case of such a gratuitous ARP? Best regards and thanks in advance for your time, Roland PS: According to the Ethereal Wiki (http://wiki.ethereal.com/Gratuitous_ARP) a gratuitous ARP can be either a request or a reply. Any experience which one is better? _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp