FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-01
"Stephen Nadas" <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:27:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F4565ABF2BF72240B26E924CE5D60AB6073093BC@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se> |
Hi Mukesh and Radia, I have just posted -01 addressing the comments received on the list (and a couple of small things we found ourselves.) I think this version is ready for WG last call. Thanks, Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 3:24 PM > To: Stephen Nadas > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-01 > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-01.txt has > been successfuly submitted by Stephen Nadas and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec > Revision: 01 > Title: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol > Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6 > Creation_date: 2008-03-19 > WG ID: vrrp > Number_of_pages: 44 > > Abstract: > This memo defines the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) for > IPv4 and IPv6. It is version three (3) of the protocol and > it is based on VRRP (version 2) for IPv4 that is defined in > RFC 3768 and on draft-ieft-vrrp-ipv6-spec-08.txt. VRRP > specifies an election protocol that dynamically assigns > responsibility for a virtual router to one of the VRRP > routers on a LAN. The VRRP router controlling the > IPv4 or IPv6 address(es) associated with a virtual router is > called the Master, and forwards packets sent to these IPv4 or > IPv6 addresses. VRRP Master routers are configured with > virtual IPv4 or > IPv6 addresses and VRRP Backup routers infer the address > family of the virtual addresses being carried based on the > transport protocol. > Within a VRRP router the virtual routers in each of the IPv4 > and IPv6 address families are a domain unto themselves and do > not overlap. > The election process provides dynamic fail over in the > forwarding responsibility should the Master become > unavailable. For IPv4, the advantage gained from using VRRP > is a higher availability default path without requiring > configuration of dynamic routing or router discovery > protocols on every end-host. For IPv6, the advantage gained > from using VRRP for IPv6 is a quicker switch over to back up > routers than can be obtained with standard IPv6 Neighbor > Discover (RFC 4861) mechanisms. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat. > > > _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp