Re: terminology questions
"Stephen Nadas" <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:19:40 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F4565ABF2BF72240B26E924CE5D60AB608089A88@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se> |
> >> 2. "Primary IP Address". > >> > >> It seems this concept applies only for IPv4? In IPv6 > there's no such > >> concept and we just call its counterpart "the link-local address"? > > > > To my understanding, concept only applies to IPv4. I'm not > sure that > > I agree with 'and we just call its counterpart "the > link-local address"' > > part of this bcos in general the semantics of IPv4 address != > > semantics of IPv6 link-local address. > > I think the semantics of the "Primary IP address" is to act > as the source IP address of the VRRP advertisements. The IPv6 > link-local address also serves for this purpose, right? > Why does the concept only apply for IPv4? I don't see a > problem extending this concept to ipv6. > Huafeng, Okay, I think see that what your are saying is in the context of VRRP, and in that sense I can agree. But "primary IP address" is (imho, far) more widely used and I was thinking about those semantics, so I prefer not to try to extend this concept as I think the confusion would outweigh the benefit. Opinion from others on the list? Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp