Re: indexing order in vrrpAssociatedIpAddrTable in draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-06.txt

Hi Kaylan,

We have cases where it is more efficient to search for all VRs within an
IfIndex if the ordering is

  { vrrpOperationsInetAddrType, ifIndex, vrrpOperationsVrId}

and

   {vrrpOperationsInetAddrType, ifIndex, vrrpOperationsVrId,
vrrpAssociatedIpAddr}

This would still satisfy Bert's request (vrrpOperationsInetAddrType as the
first one).  Is it too late to request this as a change?

Thanks,
Georges


On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 7:59 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Prakash,
>     The order was as you suggested in the initial drafts. This was
> discussed in one of the ietf meetings and  I think
> Wijnen, Bert suggested and every one agreed to change the order to what it
> is right now.
> The rational (as I remember it) for vrrpOperationsInetAddrType to be first
> is that operators would like to walk on IPv4 or IPv6 virtual routers with
> out actually  knowing vrids or ifindexes.
>
> I do not remember the exact reason of the other part of the order. Am CCing
> the WG to see if Mukesh or anyone else
> remembers the discussion.
>
> Thanks,
> Kalyan
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* ext Banthia, Prakash (Prakash) [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 14, 2008 3:43 PM
> *To:* Tata Kalyan (Nokia-S&S/MtView)
> *Cc:* Chung Kam Chung, Georges (Georges); Abdouni, Bassem (Bassem);
> Bailey, Reva Sue (Reva)
> *Subject:* indexing order in vrrpAssociatedIpAddrTable in
> draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-06.txt
>
>  Kalyan,
> Let me introduce myself. I am part of the team which is implementing
> draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-06.txt here at Alcatel-Lucent.
> And I have a question on the indexing order in vrrpAssociatedIpAddrTable.
>
> From original VRRP-MIB, here is the indexing order:
> vrrpAssoIpAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE
>     INDEX    { ifIndex, vrrpOperVrId, vrrpAssoIpAddr }
>
> From the new draft which support IPv6, here is the indexing order:
> vrrpAssociatedIpAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE
>     INDEX    { vrrpOperationsInetAddrType, vrrpOperationsVrId,
>                ifIndex, vrrpAssociatedIpAddr }
>
> I would like to have vrrpOperationsInetAddrType and vrrpAssociatedIpAddr
> objects together which is typically how ipv6 support is generally
> implemented. Our utility routines always assume these to be together.
>
> So I would prefer the following INDEX for vrrpAssociatedIpAddrTable:
>     INDEX    {  vrrpOperationsVrId, ifIndex, vrrpOperationsInetAddrType,
> vrrpAssociatedIpAddr }
>
> Let me know your thoughts on this.
> Thanks.
> --prakash
>
> _______________________________________________
> vrrp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp
>
>

_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp