Re: VRRPv3 Implementation Report

"Mukesh Gupta" <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:42:55 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.vrrp
Message-ID <FF22D8DA3CC478438280A45A7CFAD27A068092A9@ca-bay-exch-01.tropos.com>
[Copying the WG]

Lin,

It's good to hear about your implementation and your comments. I will
let Steve, the author/editor of the unified VRRP draft, respond to your
technical comments.

It would be good to receive information about the implementation of the
unified draft (draft- ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02.txt). When do you think
you would be implementing the new draft?

Steve, have you guys implemented the unified draft?

Regards
Mukesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lin Tao [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 2:23 AM
> To: Mukesh Gupta; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VRRP] VRRPv3 Implementation Report
> 
> Dear Mukesh Gupta:
>     I'm a developer in H3C. We have implemented
draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-08 in our
> Comware, and have paid attention to draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02.
There are some
> improvement, we shall develope it.
>     There is a new concept "Accept_Mode" in 6.1. In our opinion, the
Default would be True.
> Though the address is not its own, but there is requirement that the
operator can manage the
> router by connecting to this vrrp address when a virtual router in
Master, i.e. this address
> can be thought as the virtual route's own address.
>     Furthermore, we could think about wiping this mode away, and it
will bring benifit in
> implementation because of Simple design.
>     Sincerely look forward to your reply.
> 
>    Accept_Mode             Controls whether a virtual router in Master
>                            state will accept packets addressed to the
>                            address owner's IPvX address as its own if
it
>                            is not the IPvX address owner.  Default is
>                            False.
> 
>                            Note: IPv6 Neighbor Solicitations and
>                            Neighbor Advertisements should not be
dropped
>                            when Accept_Mode is False.
> 
> FYI: This is our implementation.
> ========================================
> Name of Implementation:  VRRP in Comware
> Platform: Comware
> Organization: H3C Technologies Co.
> Origin of Code: Internal development
> Information supplied by: Lin Tao [email protected]
> Tested Interoperability: None yet.
> ========================================
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mukesh Gupta
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Ross Callon
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 8:40 AM
> Subject: [VRRP] VRRPv3 Implementation Report
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> The chairs are putting together an implementation report for VRRPv3
unified draft (draft-
> ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02.txt).  If you have one or if you know of
any, please let us know
> before 10/31/08.
> 
> Here is the information that is required.
> 
> ========================================
> Name of Implementation:
> Platform:
> Organization:
> Origin of Code:
> Information supplied by:
> Tested Interoperability:
> ========================================
> 
> You can take a look at
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Implementations/rfc-2338-
> implementation.txt for examples.
> 
> Regards
> Mukesh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vrrp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp
_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp