Election or selection? Was tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02.txt
"Stephen Nadas" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:24:13 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DF78BDF6956FDD4780D5DAD88A073CF4504F0E@eusrcmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> |
> Section 2.1, bullet 4 "Provide for election ... load
> balancing". It wasn't really clear to me what was meant by this.
Hi Mark,
This text came from the v6 draft. I think it alludes to the idea that
once can imagine, e.g., 1/2 of the hosts using one VRRP router and the
other half another, although I think it might be more clear to say
either:
- Provide for selection of multiple virtual routers on a network for
load balancing
(i.e., s/elect/select/)
- Provide for capability of multiple virtual routers on a network for
load balancing
(i.e. s/election/capability/)
If I read your comment correctly, the word "election" is what is
confusing here. Does this meet your concern?
Thanks,
Steve
_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp