Re: DISCUSS and COMMENT: draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec

Please see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp/current/maillist.html where
there is some discussion of Mark Handley's tsv-dir review and also
please see attached. 

Thanks, 
Steve   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 08:34
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> Subject: DISCUSS and COMMENT: draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec 
> 
> Discuss:
> I'm holding this DISCUSS mostly until the issues raised in 
> Mark Handley's tsv-dir review have been addressed.
> 
> One further point:
> 
> Section 11., paragraph 0:
> > 11.  Intellectual Property Rights Claimed
> 
>   DISCUSS-DISCUSS: Is there a specific reason why the usual
>   boilerplate text isn't sufficient for this document?
> 
> Comment:
> Section 1., paragraph 2:
> >    Comments are solicited and should be addressed to the 
> working group's
> >    mailing list at [email protected] and/or the editor.
> 
>   Remove.
> 
> 
> Section 5.2.9., paragraph 4:
> >    This field contains either one or more IPv4 addresses or 
> one or more
> >    IPv6 addresses, that is, IPv4 and IPv6 MUST NOT both be 
> carried in
> >    one IPvX Address field.
> 
>   You probably want to add that a VRRP packet sent over IPv4 MUST
>   contain IPv4 addresses in this field and a VRRP packet sent 
> over IPv6
>   MUST contain IPv6 addresses. (In other words v6-in-v4 and vice versa
>   is not allowed.)
> 
> 
> Section 6.4., paragraph 0:
> > 6.4.  State Descriptions
> 
>   Throughout this section, I find the abbreviated text in the 
> pseudocode
>   comments (//) hard to read. Given that the pseudocode itself is in
>   English, why not merge the comments with the code and remove them?
>   Also, the bullets in the pseudocode use different symbols (-+*@),
>   which is confusing to follow.
> 
> 
> Section 9., paragraph 0:
> > 9.  Operation over FDDI, Token Ring, and ATM LANE
> 
>   Agree with Dan that this section doesn't seem to matter 
> much. Move to
>   appendix?
> 
>

_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp