Re: [tsv-dir] Arps and grat arps was (RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02.txt)
Joe Touch <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:36:00 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all, Stephen Nadas wrote: > > >> Section 8.1.2: >> >> "When a VRRP router restarts or boots, it SHOULD not send any ARP FWIW, this might read better as "SHOULD NOT" >> messages with its physical MAC address for the IPv4 >> address it owns, >> it should only send ARP messages that include Virtual MAC >> addresses." >> >> How do you ssh to the physical router, if you're not sure >> which router you'll actually reach? Does this require a >> separate IPv4 address? >> >> "When configuring an interface, VRRP routers should broadcast a >> gratuitous ARP request containing the virtual router MAC address >> for each IPv4 address on that interface." >> >> Surely a VRRP router only does this when becoming the master? >> Otherwise backup routers can cause traffic to be blackholed >> when their interface is configured. Similar text appears in 8.2.2. > > Hi Mark, > > Regards 1st point, good qn. I would like to hear WG comments please. > > Regards 2nd point, yes, when master. I can clarify text. I understand sending the gratuitous ARP on reboot/restart, but I don't understand why it matters that the physical MAC *not* be ARPed. It should not matter - the VR uses a separate IP address and MAC address anyway, right? Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkSO/AACgkQE5f5cImnZrtDfgCfePMwpWeFBk5DmLG0tlJElgM1 vUkAn1Eb2GoVK8Cdbp/n9fRnhD4Ll4YI =BClf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp