Re: question on VRRP

"Mukesh Gupta" <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:08:37 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.vrrp
Message-ID <FF22D8DA3CC478438280A45A7CFAD27A072EDFAC@ca-bay-exch-01.tropos.com>
Hi,

 

I don’t understand why a and b are connected to Sa and Sb in your picture.

 

If Sa failed, Rb, which should be operating in the Backup state before the failure of Sa, will stop getting the VRRP advertisements from Ra and after the Master_Down_Timer fires, Rb will take over as the Master. Note that Rb does not require any ack from Ra.

 

- Mukesh 

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DingYe
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 5:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [VRRP] question on VRRP

 

Just curious how does following topology work with VRRP? 
Ra/Rb are two routers using VRRP; Sa/Sb are two switches; host a, b c. 
initially both a and b communites to c through Ra; then how does VRRP know if Sa failed, Rb will take over; if Sb failed, Ra will still carry the traffic. If Ra does not receive any ack from Rb, how can it figure out if it is Sa or Sb that has problem? Thanks, Ye. 
         c 
      /      \ 
    Ra      Rb 
    |         | 
    Sa----Sb 
     |\      /| 
     a b    a b         
    

________________________________

把MSN装进手机,更多聊天乐趣等你挖掘! 立刻下载! <http://mobile.msn.com.cn/>

_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp