Re: VRRP WG Status

Thanks for that.

I believe I owe you an action to chase down the Discusses and Comments (in 
association with the document shepherd) on VRRPv3. I guess I will wait for 
the new version.

Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mukesh Gupta" <[email protected]>
To: "Ross Callon" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Cc: "Radia Perlman" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:45 PM
Subject: VRRP WG Status


> Ross/Adrian,
>
> Radia and I are unable to attend the IETF meeting. Here is the current 
> status of the WG :)
>
> * VRRP version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6 (unified)
>   * draft 03 that attempts to address the IESG comments and DISCUSSes
>     was published.
>   * A few additional items were indentified on the mailing list. The
>     editor plans to publish another revision.
>   * ADs and IESG members with DISCUSS comments need to review the
>     latest version to see if the comments are addressed.
>
> * VRRP unified MIB
>   * The new draft that is inline with the unified protocol is ready
>     but the author is having difficulties in converting the word
>     doc to the draft ☹
>
> * Subsecond Timers
>   * Supported in the unified VRRP protocol draft
>
> * WG not meeting in this IETF
>
> Regards
> VRRP Chairs (Radia & Mukesh)
> 


_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp